|
New Methods for Building Protection from Settlement
Due to Underground Transit Transit Construction
2003
Victor S. Romero, PE CEG and
William H. Hansmire,
PE
Jacobs Associates
San Francisco, CA

|
|

Despite the best efforts of a contractor to minimize
ground movements associated with underground
construction, surface settlement is a constant concern when
constructing subsurface transit systems in urban
environments. While methods for prediction of settlement
due to tunnel and cut-and-cover construction have been
well established since the early 1970s, methods for mitigating
settlement or protecting buildings from settlement have
changed significantly in the United States over the last two
decades. Tunnel excavation methods that minimize ground
movement are being used with greater frequency, such as
earth pressure balance (EPB) tunnel boring machines and
construction aspects of the New Austrian Tunneling Method
(NATM). Underpinning, traditionally an expensive and
disruptive building protection method, has been largely
supplanted by ground modification methods to mitigate
settlement. Examples of ground modification for building
protection include permeation grouting and compaction
grouting, which came into widespread use in the 1980s, as
wells as compensation grouting, which was first used in the
United States in the 1990s. In addition, new, sophisticated
instrumentation systems have been developed to monitor
building movement with great accuracy in real time, thus
allowing efficient and effective grouting efforts. Two
examples of compensation grouting for settlement protection
are reviewed: the Tren Urbano transit system in Puerto Rico,
which used compensation grouting in conjunction with an
automated building monitoring system; and the Eastside
Light Rail Transit project in Los Angeles, which is planning
to implement compensation grouting in a phased payment
approach.
|